You are viewing Payment transaction

Contactless Payment Transactions Market Size, Forecast and Top Companies – Barclays Bank PLC, Wirecard AG, Ingenico Group, VeriFone Proxama PLC, Gemalto NV

New Jersey, United States, – The Contactless payment transaction market report contains the most basic information on the market. This comprehensive report offers insights into the market, models and drivers of business growth. It also includes contactless payment transactions market share, sales volume and education charts. He was able to combine important and additional information, such as commitments from market leaders, into a well-designed report. The Contactless Payment Transactions Market report is an essential view of strategies and insights. It is mainly aimed at business leaders. The primary objective of this Contactless Payment Transactions report is to provide industry knowledge and help our clients achieve natural growth in their respective fields. The Contactless Payment Transactions report also shows a new upward trend which includes market conditions and market forecast 2021-2028.

The contactless payment transactions market was valued at USD 11.26 billion in 2018 and is expected to reach USD 55.97 billion by 2026, with a CAGR of 22.08% from 2019 to 2026.

This study presents the principles of the Contactless Payment Transactions market: regional definitions and analyzes, software and business review, industry strategies and guidelines, product specifications, production methods, price agreements, etc. The report concludes with an assessment of SWOT contactless payment transactions, Assessment of investment feasibility and assessment of return on investment.

The report has conducted extensive research on the market segments and sub-segments and clarified which market segment will dominate the market during the forecast period. To assist clients in making informed decisions about company investment plans and strategies in the Contactless Payment Transactions market, the report includes detailed information on regional market performance and competitive analysis.

The report covers an in-depth analysis of the major market players in the market, along with their business overview, expansion plans, and strategies. The major players studied in the report include:

Barclays Bank PLC, Ingenico Group, Wirecard AG, VeriFone Proxama PLC, Gemalto NV

Segmentation of the contactless payment transaction market

Contactless payment transaction market, by payment method

• Contactless card
• Portable devices
• Contactless mobile payment

Contactless Payment Transactions Market, By End Use

• Retail
• Media and entertainment
• Hospitality
• Health care
• Others

Scope of Contactless Payment Transactions Market Report

Report attribute Details
Market size available for years 2021 – 2028
Reference year considered 2021
Historical data 2015 – 2020
Forecast period 2021 – 2028
Quantitative units Revenue in millions of USD and CAGR from 2021 to 2028
Covered segments Types, applications, end users, etc.
Cover of the report Revenue forecast, company ranking, competitive landscape, growth factors and trends
Regional scope North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa
Scope of customization Free customization of the report (equivalent to 8 working days for analysts) with purchase. Add or change the scope of country, region and segment.
Price and purchase options Take advantage of personalized shopping options to meet your exact research needs. Explore purchasing options

Geographic segment covered in the report:

The Contactless Payment Transaction report provides information about the market area, which is further subdivided into sub-regions and countries / regions. In addition to the market share in each country and sub-region, this chapter of this report also contains information on profit opportunities. This chapter of the report mentions the market share and growth rate of each region, country and sub-region during the estimated period.

  • The Middle East and Africa (GCC countries and Egypt)
  • North America (United States, Mexico and Canada)
  • South America (Brazil etc …)
  • Europe (Turkey, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.)
  • Asia Pacific (Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia and Australia)

Key questions answered in the report:

  • Who are the main global players in this contactless payment transaction market?
  • What is their company profile, their product information, their contact details?
  • What was the global market status of the market?
  • What was the capacity, production value, cost and profit of the market?
  • What are the projections of the global industry taking into account the capacity, output and production value?
  • What will the cost and profit estimate be?
  • What will be the market share, supply and consumption?
  • What is the market chain analysis by upstream commodity and downstream industry?
  • What are the market dynamics of the market?
  • What are the challenges and opportunities?
  • What should be the entry strategies, the countermeasures to the economic impact, the marketing channels for the industry?

Visualize the market for contactless payment transactions using verified market intelligence: –

Verified Market Intelligence is our BI platform for narrative storytelling for this market. VMI offers in-depth forecasting trends and accurate insights into over 20,000 emerging and niche markets, helping you make critical revenue-impacting decisions for a bright future.

VMI provides a holistic overview and global competitive landscape with regard to region, country and segment as well as the major players in your market. Present your market report and findings with a built-in presentation function, saving over 70% of your time and resources for investor arguments, sales and marketing, R&D and product development. VMI enables data delivery in interactive Excel and PDF formats with over 15+ key market indicators for your market.

About Us: Verified Market Research®

Verified Market Research® is a leading global research and consulting company providing advanced analytical research solutions, personalized advice and in-depth data analysis for over 10 years to individuals and businesses seeking precise research, reliable and up to date. technical data and advice. We provide insight into strategic and growth analysis, the data needed to achieve business goals and help make critical revenue decisions.

Our research studies help our clients make superior data-driven decisions, understand market forecasts, capitalize on future opportunities, and maximize efficiency by working as a partner to deliver accurate and valuable information. The industries we cover cover a broad spectrum including technology, chemicals, manufacturing, energy, food and beverage, automotive, robotics, packaging, construction, mining and manufacturing. gas. Etc.

At Verified Market Research, we help understand the holistic factors indicating the market and most current and future market trends. Our analysts, with their deep expertise in data collection and governance, use industry techniques to gather and examine data at all stages. They are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, subject matter expertise, and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research.

After serving over 5,000 clients, we have provided reliable market research services to over 100 Global Fortune 500 companies such as Amazon, Dell, IBM, Shell, Exxon Mobil, General Electric, Siemens, Microsoft, Sony and Hitachi. We have co-consulted with some of the world’s largest consulting firms such as McKinsey & Company, Boston Consulting Group, Bain and Company for personalized research and consulting projects for businesses around the world.

Contact us:

Mr. Edwyne Fernandes

Verified Market Research®

United States: +1 (650) -781-480
UK: +44 (753) -715-0008
APAC: +61 (488) -85-9400
US Toll Free: +1 (800) -782-1768

E-mail: [email protected]

Website:- https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/


Source link

Which payment transaction authentication methods are better?

Nowadays, the usual methods of authenticating users on portals, corporate systems, VPNs, etc. are all familiar to us.

We all know about authentication factors (what you know, what you have, and what you are), two-factor authentication, multi-factor authentication, how to implement these factors, and much more.

When it comes to payment transactions, there are many hidden pitfalls, as there are a series of fundamental differences between a normal application in a business, for example, and a payment system like a plastic card, an e-wallet, etc. .

Let’s see this in more detail.

When it comes to enterprise level authentication, we can find many proven solutions to solve the problem; protocols (such as Active Directory, SAML, RADIUS, OpenID, OAuth, a set of RFCs or a set of ISO standards), vendor specifications, software and hardware to facilitate vendor authentication, as well as software and hardware that can communicate with these providers.

Another topic of discussion concerns client authentication devices, such as tokens, MAC calculators, smart cards, NFC rings, fingerprint scanners, etc.

This huge market always tries to stay organized and create intercompatible solutions. This is great, because you can get an enterprise-level application (for example, an e-doc system) and link it to your users’ directory through Identity Management (IdM) and with various authentication methods. via a Single Sign-On (SSO) system.

The SSO system will cover your authentication requirements, while the IDM will manage users and authentication factors. It doesn’t matter which supplier provides these components for you. All will work with standardized protocols.

Learn about the different payment transaction authentication methods

The issue of a payment infrastructure is, however, much more complex. I see two main reasons for this. The first is that user management is totally different from traditional applications. The second is that there is no standard for authenticating a user or a user’s transaction through the processing of payment transactions.

As a result, each financial company (bank, fintech, e-wallet, investment platform, etc.) must invent something according to its own vision and its own risks.

Let’s say you are a regular bank. If we ignore features like the open API then you are giving two main options for a user to spend their money; using a payment card and via a remote banking system with mobile banking, online banking, etc.

When it comes to offline payments with a card, there is no problem. You work with point of sale terminals via a payment system such as Visa or Mastercard. The payment process is completely transparent and secure.

In the case of a cardless transaction (such as in e-commerce), then in accordance with the requirements of Verified-By-Visa and those of similar services, you, as the card issuer, must authenticate the cardholder. the map.

The transaction will be processed by specialized card processing infrastructure and software. It is usually a separate division of a bank with its own rules that combine the requirements of the payment system such as those of Visa and internal risk management.

These rules, infrastructures and software provide a very limited range of transaction authentication mechanisms. Usually one of the following is used; card PIN, a separate static PIN, one-time password (OTP) via SMS, or one-time password via push notification.

User password privacy concept, technology photo created by rawpixel.com – www.freepik.com

Can you manage the authentication methods? No. Can you use anything better and more secure than texting? No. Can you ask a treatment provider to cover your needs? Yes, but be prepared to pay. Without any guarantee. Compare that with enterprise apps and you will see the difference.

You might be asking yourself, do I really need to change something? Maybe things are going well the way they are? Let’s see.

Using a card’s PIN code to authenticate an Internet payment transaction is not a good idea. It can be diverted at many points on its way from the user to where it is being processed.

There are many tools and techniques for doing this; keyloggers, man-in-the-middle attacks, man-in-the-browser attacks, Trojans, exploits, etc. I don’t think there is any need to explain why card pin theft is a bad thing.

A separate static PIN has the same vulnerabilities, but at least the card PIN will not be stolen and the card will not be used offline by the perpetrator.

The disadvantages of an OTP via SMS have been discussed several times. It is not secure at all as it has a large number of technical and technological vulnerabilities and can be hijacked using social engineering, phishing, etc.

In addition, it is extremely expensive. And what’s more, its use is increasingly banned in more and more countries due to its drawbacks.

An OTP via push notification has the same disadvantages from a technical and technological point of view. It is, however, inexpensive.

How do you choose an authentication method for your organization?

Going forward, you have several options for setting up your remote banking system.

The first option is to build it around card processing. In this case, you will have all the authentication issues, eg security and maintenance, from the previous paragraphs.

You will become hostage to slow, very exclusive and expensive processing providers, rules of payment systems like Visa or Mastercard, etc. Forget about modern and practical services.

The second option is to create a remote banking system to your own specifications. Using modern techniques, it can be a set of back-end services and a front-end solution.

In this case, you can configure the transaction processing flow as you wish, with transaction authentication following your own rules. Of course, you can find solutions like this from trusted vendors.

If a vendor’s solution or your own internal solution allows, you can integrate IdM and SSO into your remote banking system and additional services.

I think if you could choose a payment transaction authentication method, you wouldn’t choose an insecure and expensive method with many known issues like SMS messages or a static PIN.

From my perspective, the best solution for payment transactions is to use mobile-centric confirmation solutions like PayConfirm. It has a very high level of security, is cheaper than SMS, and is much more convenient for users.

If we continue to imagine that you are a bank, you might of course prefer to combine the transaction authentication methods for cardless transactions and for a remote banking system.

Yes, you can take the simpler route and make all your systems just as bad as the worst component of it (card processing, for example). Another way, however, is to push treatment providers to meet your needs.

Such requests may dictate authentication standards, as in the corporate sector. It will be good for everyone involved: financial institutions, security providers, end users, support companies, etc.

Thus, the position of a bank is not very convenient in terms of authentication of payment transactions. But fintechs, e-wallets and other financial institutions don’t have the same restrictions as a bank.

This means they can use modern, mobile-centric solutions that are cost effective, secure and convenient for end users.

Featured image credit: tech photo created by rawpixel.com – www.freepik.com

User-friendly printing, PDF and email


Source link

B2B cross-border payment transactions value to exceed $ 42 trillion in 2026 as e-commerce market growth drives commerce

BASINGSTOKE, England, August 31, 2021– (BUSINESS WIRE) – A new study from Juniper Research has found that the transaction value of B2B cross-border payments of all payment types will exceed $ 42.7 trillion in 2026, up from $ 34 trillion in 2021. The research identified this growth of over 25% is driven by the growing popularity of e-commerce markets, which are generally cross-border in nature.

Research has identified that the B2B cross-border payments market is highly fragmented, with payments being slow, expensive, and difficult to track. As cross-border e-commerce accelerates, B2B payments must keep pace, with the use of automation, instant payment rails and solutions such as virtual IBANs, which enable the acceptance of payment options. local, essential to future success.

For more information, download the free white paper: Breaking the deadlock for innovation in B2B payments

Blockchain has potential, but development is needed

The new research, B2B Payments: Key Opportunities, Vendor Strategies, and Market Forecast 2021-2026, found that blockchain plays an important role in B2B cross-border payments, with services such as B2B Visa Connection and RippleNet with significant potential. However, the report identified that blockchain is not essential to this process – a network of networks can be built without using blockchain, which means blockchain providers need to focus on unique capabilities, such as traceability and immutability, to make it more attractive for B2B payments than alternatives. .

Research author Nick Maynard explained: “Blockchain is not a silver bullet for the challenges of cross-border payments, but it has an important role to play. For networks, making connections is essential to ensure the best possible reach and appeal in the increasingly globalized B2B payments market. ‘

Bank transfers dominating B2B cross-border payments

Research found that by 2026, 80% of the overall B2B cross-border payment transaction value will be via wire transfers; an increase from 70% in 2021. Instant payments will represent a relatively small proportion of B2B wire transfers, at 22% of these in value in 2026.

Research recommends that until cross-border instant payments are ubiquitous, payment providers should fill in the gaps by ensuring that alternative and manageable methods, such as virtual cards, are available to businesses.

B2B Payments Market Research: https://www.juniperresearch.com/researchstore/fintech-payments/b2b-payments-research-report

Download the white paper: https://www.juniperresearch.com/whitepapers/breaking-the-innovation-stalemate-in-b2b-payments

Juniper Research provides research and analysis services to the global high-tech communications industry; providing advice, analyst reports and industry commentary.

See the source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210830005018/en/

Contacts

Sam Smith, Press Relations
T: +44 (0) 1256 830002
E: [email protected]


Source link

Major Key Players of Mobile Payment Transactions Market, Size, Share, Demand, Opportunities and Forecast to 2028

By Posted on 3min read9 views

Mobile Payment Transactions Market Analysis, Mobile Payment Transaction, Mobile Payment Transactions Market, Developed Countries Mobile Payment Transactions Market Analysis, Mobile Payment Transactions Market By Application, Mobile Payment Transactions Market By type, Mobile payment transaction market development, Mobile payment transaction market evolution opportunities with top industry experts,

Global market vision recently published a research report titled Mobile Payment Transactions Market. Primary and secondary research methods were used to construct this report. Analysis was derived using history and predictions. The report includes an in-depth study of geographies, revenue forecast, segmentation, and market share.

The global mobile payment transactions market is expected to prosper in terms of volume and value during the forecast period. The report provides an understanding of the different market drivers, threats, opportunities, and limitations. Analysts used SWOT and Porter’s Five Forces Analysis to determine the impact of these factors on market growth during the forecast period.

Access a PDF sample of the Global Mobile Payment Transactions Market Research Report with Opportunities and Strategies to Drive Growth – Impact and Recovery of COVID-19 @ https://www.globalmarketvision.com/sample_request/13017

The main company profiles of the mobile payment transactions market:

PayPal, GoogleWallet, MasterCard, Visa, LevelUp, Brain Tree, MoneyBokkers, Worlpay, Clinkle, Single Point

Segment by type, the mobile payment transaction market is segmented into:

Near Field Communication (NFC), Direct, WAP, SMS, USSD, Others

Segment by application, the mobile payment transactions market is segmented into:

Travel & Ticketing, Bank, Merchandise, Food & Drink, Airtime, Others

The SWOT analysis administered during the study highlights the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats faced by the major vendors. The industry research analyzes market segmentation supports product type, application, sale, and countries. , and weighed to promote actionable decisions

Get 20% Discount on Various Types of Buy It Now Licenses @ https://www.globalmarketvision.com/check-discount/13017

Regional Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2021-2028)

  • North America (United States, Canada, Mexico)
  • Europe (Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, Others)
  • Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Southeast Asia, others)
  • The Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, others)
  • South America (Brazil, others)

Main information that this study will provide:

  • 360-degree mobile payment transactions market overview based on global and regional level
  • Market share and sales revenue by key players and emerging regional players
  • Competitors – In this section, various leading Mobile Payment Transaction industry players are studied on the basis of their company profile, product portfolio, capacity, price, cost and revenue.
  • A separate chapter on the entropy of the mobile payment transactions market to better understand the aggressiveness of Leader vis-à-vis the market [Merger & Acquisition / Recent Investment and Key Developments]
  • Patent analysis Number of patents / Trademark registered in recent years.

Key influence of the mobile payment transaction market:

  • What was the size of the mobile payment transactions market, growth trends and market forecasts?
  • What will be the CAGR of the mobile payment transactions market during the forecast period (2021-2028)?
  • Which segments were the most attractive for investments? How these segments are expected to grow over the forecast period.
  • What sharing of assessments for regional and national segments?
  • trends mapping the latest technological advancements and strategic initiatives taken by major vendors in the mobile payment transaction market.
  • What policy changes will help stakeholders strengthen their supply chain and demand network?
  • What trends in the mobile payment transactions market (drivers, restraints, opportunities, threats, challenges, investment opportunities and recommendations)
  • What strategies have helped established players reduce supplier, purchasing and logistics costs?
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the main common trends?

Get a research report within 48 hours @ https://www.globalmarketvision.com/checkout/?currency=USD&type=single_user_license&report_id=13017

Any special requirement for this report, please let us know and we can provide a custom report.

Contact us

George Miller | Business development

Call: + 1-775 237 4147

E-mail: [email protected]

Global market vision

Website: www.globalmarketvision.com


Source link